After last week’s post on low milk supply/insufficient milk syndrome and how common medical practices may contribute to these problems, my intention was to move on to looking at additional physiological factors that might contribute to diagnosis of low milk syndrome and general patterns of breastfeeding cessation. However, based on the comments following the post, it appears that a brief interlude would be useful – and so I bring you “who manages the mammaries: physiology edition”, specially looking at how milk synthesis starts and milk supply is maintained. I think this will be useful for the overall trajectory of the multipart series emerging here.
The onset of milk production occurs with lactogenesis. In
humans, this is split into two general stages, the first occurring during the transition from pregnancy to lactation and the second characterized by secretory activation of the mammary gland. More than simply the onset of milk production, each discrete physiological phase hallmarks a number of important cellular changes within the mammary epithelium
and the mammary ducts. The first phase, secretory differentiation, previously called lactogenesis I is followed by secretory activation, formerly known as lactogenesis 2,
is characterized by a shift to full milk production and further cellular level
changes (Neville et al., 2012). Secretory activation is usually complete within 72 hours following
birth, however there is an increased incidence in delayed activation among American mothers (Nommsen-Rivers et al., 2012) compared to other populations
where lactogenesis may occur much sooner. The transition from secretory differentiation to activation also signals the shift from endocrine to autocrine control
(Riordan and Wambach, 2010).
The secretory differentiation phase starts during the later half of pregnancy,
and is characterized by an overall increase in breast size, reflecting both
ductal growth and the terminal differentiation of mammary epithelial cells into
mature mammary epithelial cells (lactocytes) capable of producing milk. Lactocytes
begin secreting fat, protein, and lactose (Riordan and Wambach, 2010) in small
amounts. During this period, the gap junctions between the lactocytes are open, allowing
for the passage of larger molecules between the cells and into the milk. Following the decrease in circulating
progesterone levels after the delivery of the infant and placenta, the gap
junctions between the lactocytes close.
“Copious” milk production, characteristic of secretory activation, starts with this shift to autocrine
regulation. Milk synthesis will be maintained by both galactopoietic hormones
and milk removal after day 3-8, depending on individual variation.
The mammary glands are highly vascularized, with two main
arteries – the internal mammary artery (anterior & posterior branches) and
the lateral mammary branch of the lateral thoracic artery, although in about
30% of women, other arteries may also contribute to mammary blood flow. Blood
supply to the breasts more than doubles during pregnancy and remains stable
during lactation. The increase in blood supply is necessary to provide
resources to the individual lactocytes and surrounding cells such as
myoepthelial cells and adipocytes (fat cells). Aljazaf (2005) estimates that the
ratio of milk yield to blood flow is 1:500, highlighting the importance of a
large blood supply for these tissues, although Geddes (2012) cautions that
there is not clear evidence for a direct link between mammary blood flow and
milk synthesis rate. Within the breast, lactocytes line each alveolus with a
single layer of cells. Each cluster is surrounded by myoepithelial cells and
fat cells (Figure 1). There is little evidence for nerves extending to the
individual alveolus, although certainly both larger and smaller nerves are
found throughout the breast. However, myoepithelial cells and lactocytes have a
constant blood supply, allowing for hormonal signaling as well as cellular
uptake of glucose, fatty acids, amino acids, and other substances.
 |
| Figure 1: The new visualization of the mammary gland, thanks to ultrasound techniques (Geddes, 2007) and other methodological breakthroughs. Image from Medela. |
Regular – but not scheduled – removal of milk from the
breasts is necessary to maintain milk synthesis following secretory activation.
Breastfeeding or milk removal is not necessary for the onset of milk synthesis
but is necessary for continued synthesis. Often described simply as a
“supply-demand response” (Riordan and Wambach, 2010), milk synthesis is in fact
an elaborate orchestration. Infant suckling,
through the stimulation of nerves in the nipple, triggers nerve pulses to the
supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus. Paraventricular
neurons project to the posterior pituitary, where stimulation leads to the
release of oxytocin (Rinamen 2007); similar neuron projections trigger the
release of prolactin from lactotrophic cells in the anterior pituitary (Kiss et
al., 1986). Oxytocin and prolactin travel through maternal circulation to the
mammary gland, where oxytocin binds to specific receptors on myoepithelial
cells and prolactin to prolactin receptors on the lactocytes themselves (Figure
2).
 |
| Figure 2: The brain releases oxytocin and prolactin following stimulation of the nipple – both prolactin and oxytocin have important functions in milk ejection and synthesis. Image from: VisualMD.com. For more information check out: VisualMDHealthCenters. |
The binding of oxytocin to the myoepithelial cells triggers
the cells to contract. These contractions force milk into the ducts.
Progressive contractions will push milk progressively through the ducts towards
the nipple, provided the infant (or breast pump) is maintaining a vacuum
(Ramsey et al., 2005). Blood flow to the alveolus decreases just prior to milk
ejection followed by an increase 1-2 minutes later (Geddes 2007).
Meanwhile, prolactin binds to prolactin receptors on the
lactocyte, specifically those expressed on the basal membrane side in contact
with the maternal blood supply (Figure 3).
Binding activates transcription mechanisms in the lactocyte, leading to
the activation of genes for the production of milk proteins and lactose (Mohammad
et al., 2012; Rhoads et al., 2009), as well as fatty acid synthesis and
assembly of the milk fat globule (Maningat et al., 2009). Although prolactin
peaks following nipple stimulation, there does not appear to be a direct
association between circulating plasma prolactin levels and the rate of milk
synthesis (Cox et al., 1996), and maternal prolactin levels decrease over the
course of lactation. It is likely that autocrine regulation is largely
responsible for local control of milk synthesis rates. Daly et al., (1996) have
shown that breasts holding more milk (with longer interfed intervals) have
decreased milk synthesis rates compared to empty breasts, providing an explanatory
framework for the 17-33 mL/hr rate proposed by Arthur et al., in 1989. This may also explain why milk fat increases
from fore to hind milk (Daly et al., 1993; Kent et al., 2006) – the cellular
machinery for producing milk and the uptake of long chain fatty acids from
maternal circulation are increased, facilitating the transfer of fat into milk.
Additional hormones, including glucocorticoids such as cortisol, and metabolic
hormones such as insulin, appear to also play a role in milk synthesis and
mammary function. Glucocorticoids may
prioritize glucose for mammary tissue and amplify the effects of prolactin on
milk protein synthesis while insulin appears to play a role in maintaining the
integrity of the mammary epithelium itself.
 |
Figure 3: Association between milk synthesis rate and breast
fullness through the changes to prolactin receptors. Image: VisualMD.com
|
And this system works pretty well – except when it can’t.
And one big risk of reducing milk synthesis is letting too much milk accumulate
in the ducts and alveoli without regular emptying. As milk accumulates, certain
areas of the ducts may distend slightly. This distension leads to two primary
problems: 1) increasing concentrations of feedback inhibitor of lactation in
the milk in the ducts (Peaker, 1998) and 2) distortion of the lactocytes themselves.
This distortion limits the ability of prolactin to bind to its receptor on the
lactocyte and decreases milk synthesis (Streuli et al., 1995).
It’s actually a very elegant system, set up to minimize
waste. If the infant is eating less, either because of supplemental foods,
illness, or infant loss, decreasing milk synthesis is actually not a bad idea.
It takes, based on the calculations by Prentice et al., (1988) considerable
energy to produce milk – about 77.2-80.3 Calories per 100 milliliters of milk
(72.66 Calories received by the infant) or about 90-94% return on investment.
Still, if you figure 750mL of milk per day, that’s 579+ calories per day and if
the infant is not eating all 750 mL, reducing synthesis saves energy.
It is only when the system gets out of whack – possibly
because of scheduled feedings, supplemental foods (especially formula), infant
illness or poor latch/vacuum – that milk synthesis is down regulated when it
does not need to be. Essentially, the physiology is responding to the change in
demand – the shifting baseline (Olson 2002). And like any shifting baseline,
the change is often gradual, tiny decreases accumulating over days. This can
lead to an actual decrease in milk supply, as the breast “thinks” the infant is
getting enough to eat. The good news is, it is reversible – the same signals
that communicated “too much” can signal “not enough” provided the stimulus is
there. The reality is though, that for
most women (except that ~5%) with “low milk supply” nursing more can help with
milk supply.
References
IMAGES: All images
from the VisualMD.com
Arthur PG, Jones TJ, Spruce J, Hartmann PE. (1989) Measuring
short-term rates of milk synthesis in breast-feeding mothers. Q J Exp Physiol.
1989 Jul;74(4):419-28.
Cox DB, Owens RA, Hartmann PE. (1996) Blood and milk
prolactin and the rate of milk synthesis in women. Exp Physiol. 81(6):1007-20.
Daly SE, Di Rosso A, Owens RA, Hartmann PE. (1993) Degree of
breast emptying explains changes in the fat content, but not fatty acid
composition, of human milk. Exp Physiol. 78(6):741-55.
Daly SE, Kent JC, Owens RA, Hartmann PE. (1996) Frequency
and degree of milk removal and the short-term control of human milk synthesis.
Exp Physiol. 81(5):861-75.
Geddes DT. (2007) Inside the lactating breast: the latest
anatomy research. J Midwifery Womens Health. 52(6):556-63.
Geddes DT, Aljazaf KM, Kent JC, Prime DK, Spatz DL, Garbin
CP, Lai CT, Hartmann PE. (2012) Blood flow characteristics of the human
lactating breast. J Hum Lact. 28(2):145-52. doi:
10.1177/0890334411435414.
Kent JC, Mitoulas LR, Cregan MD, Ramsay DT, Doherty DA,
Hartmann PE. (2006) Volume and frequency of breastfeedings and fat content of breast
milk throughout the day. Pediatrics 117(3):e387-95.
Kiss JZ, Kanyicska B, Nagy GY. (1986) The hypothalamic
paraventricular nucleus has a pivotal role in regulation of prolactin release
in lactating rats. Endocrinology. 119(2):870-3.
Maningat PD, Sen P, Rijnkels M, Sunehag AL, Hadsell DL, Bray
M, Haymond MW. (2009) Gene expression in the human mammary epithelium during
lactation: the milk fat globule transcriptome. Physiol Genomics. 37(1):12-22.
Mohammad MA, Hadsell DL, Haymond MW. (2012) Gene regulation
of UDP-galactose synthesis and transport: potential rate-limiting processes in
initiation of milk production in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab.
303(3):E365-76. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00175.2012.
Neville MC, Anderson SM, McManaman JL, Badger TM, Bunik M,
Contractor N, Crume T, Dabelea D, Donovan SM, Forman N, Frank DN, Friedman JE,
German JB, Goldman A, Hadsell D, Hambidge M, Hinde K, Horseman ND, Hovey RC,
Janoff E, Krebs NF, Lebrilla CB, Lemay DG, MacLean PS, Meier P, Morrow AL, Neu
J, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Raiten DJ, Rijnkels M, Seewaldt V, Shur BD, VanHouten J,
Williamson P. (2012) Lactation and neonatal nutrition: defining and refining
the critical questions. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 17(2):167-88. doi:
10.1007/s10911-012-9261-5.
Nommsen-Rivers LA, Dolan LM, Huang B. (2012) Timing of stage II lactogenesis is predicted by antenatal metabolic health in a cohort of primiparas. Breastfeed Med. 7(1):43-9. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2011.0007.
Olson, R. (2002) Shifting Baselines: the truth about ocean
decline. LA TIMES, Sunday Opinion Section.
Peaker M, Wilde CJ, Knight CH. (1998) Local control of the
mammary gland. Biochem Soc Symp. 63:71-9.
Prentice AM, Prentice A (1988) Energy costs of lactation. Ann.
Rev. Nutr. 8:63-79.
Ramsay DT, Kent JC, Hartmann RA, Hartmann PE. (2005) Anatomy
of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imaging. J Anat.
206(6):525-34.
Rhoads RE, Grudzien-Nogalska E. (2007) Translational
regulation of milk protein synthesis at secretory activation. J Mammary Gland
Biol Neoplasia. 12(4):283-92.
Rinaman L. (2007) Visceral sensory inputs to the endocrine
hypothalamus. Front Neuroendocrinol. 28(1):50-60.
Riordan J, Wambach K. (2010) Breastfeeding and Human
Lactation, 4th edition. Sudbury: Jones and Barlett.
Streuli CH, Edwards GM, Delcommenne M, Whitelaw CB, Burdon
TG, Schindler C, Watson CJ. (1995) Stat5 as a target for regulation by
extracellular matrix. J Biol Chem. 15;270(37):21639-44.
Wilde CJ, Addey CV, Bryson JM, Finch LM, Knight CH, Peaker
M. (1998) Autocrine regulation of milk secretion. Biochem Soc Symp. 63:81-90.